Proxy Statement
About the Board of Directors and its Committees

Verizon’s Board of Directors has the independence, professional experience, expertise and commitment to effectively oversee management’s performance and act in the long-term best interests of shareholders.


Verizon’s Corporate Governance Guidelines require that a substantial majority of the members of the Board be independent Directors. The Guidelines establish standards for evaluating the independence of each Director. A Director is considered independent if the Board finds that the Director has no material relationship with Verizon, except as a Director. The standards, which comply with the NYSE’s governance standards and all other applicable laws, identify the types of relationships that, if material, would impair a Director’s independence. The standards set monetary thresholds at which the Board would consider the relationships to be material. To determine that a Director is independent, the Board must find that a Director does not have any relationship that is likely to impair his or her ability to act independently. The Board makes this determination by evaluating the facts and circumstances for each Director.

The Corporate Governance and Policy Committee conducts an annual review of the independence of members of the Board and its Committees and reports its findings to the full Board. Based on the recommendation of the Corporate Governance and Policy Committee, the Board has determined that the 11 incumbent non-employee Directors who are standing for election are independent: Richard L. Carrión, M. Frances Keeth, Robert W. Lane, Sandra O. Moose, Joseph Neubauer, Donald T. Nicolaisen, Thomas H. O’Brien, Clarence Otis, Jr., Hugh B. Price, John W. Snow and John R. Stafford. The Board has also determined that Robert D. Storey, who retired from the Board in 2008, was independent.

In determining the independence of Mr. Carrión, Mr. Lane, Mr. Neubauer, Mr. Otis, Mr. Price and Dr. Snow, the Board considered payments for telecommunications services that the companies that employ them made to Verizon. In determining Mr. Neubauer’s independence, the Board also considered payments that Verizon made under a competitively bid contract for food and facility management services to the company that employs him. In determining Mr. Stafford’s independence, the Board considered his serving as a director of another company where Verizon’s CEO also served as a director through February 2008. In applying the independence standards, the independent Directors have determined that these general business transactions and relationships were not material under the standards in the Guidelines and do not impair the ability of those Directors to act independently.

Attendance at Meetings

In 2008, the Board of Directors met 11 times. Seven meetings were regularly scheduled and four were special meetings. No Director standing for election attended fewer than 75% percent of the total number of meetings of the Board and the Committees to which the Director was assigned. The average attendance was 96%.

Directors are expected to attend the annual meeting of shareholders. In 2008, all of the Directors standing for election attended the annual meeting.

The independent Directors meet regularly in executive session without any members of management present. The independent Directors are required to meet in executive session at least once a year to review and evaluate the performance of the Board and to evaluate the performance and approve the compensation of the CEO. In practice, the independent Directors typically meet in executive session at the end of each Board meeting.

Committees of the Board

The Board of Directors has established three standing Committees – the Audit Committee, the Corporate Governance and Policy Committee and the Human Resources Committee. Each Committee has a written charter that defines the specific responsibilities of that Committee. The Committee charters are available on the Corporate Governance section of our website at You may also obtain a copy of a charter by sending a written request to the Assistant Corporate Secretary at the address given under “Contacting Verizon.”

The Chairperson of each Committee approves the agenda and materials for each meeting. At least once a year, each Committee performs a self-assessment and reviews its processes and practices to ensure that the Committee has sufficient information, resources and time to fulfill its obligations and to determine whether any changes should be made to its processes, practices or charter. Under the Corporate Governance Guidelines, each Committee has the authority to retain independent advisors to assist it in carrying out its responsibilities.

The Audit Committee


Thomas H. O’Brien, Chairperson
M. Frances Keeth
Robert W. Lane

Sandra O. Moose
Donald T. Nicolaisen
Clarence Otis, Jr.

The Board has determined that each member of the Committee is an audit committee financial expert and meets the independence requirements of applicable laws, the NYSE and the Guidelines. The Committee met 11 times during 2008. The report of the Audit Committee is included on page 10 of this proxy statement.

  • Summary of Key Responsibilities:
    • Review risk management and controls, including the process of identifying and monitoring high-priority risks and developing effective mitigation strategies which management incorporates into its strategic decision-making, and report to the Board on these matters;
    • Oversee financial reporting and disclosure matters, including
      • Annual audited and quarterly unaudited financial statements and related footnotes and disclosures; and
      • Any significant events, transactions, changes in accounting estimates or changes in important accounting principles and any major issues as to adequacy of internal controls;
    • Oversee Verizon’s internal audit function;
    • Oversee Verizon’s processes for ethical, legal and regulatory compliance;
    • Review the performance and qualifications of the independent registered public accounting firm (including their independence);
    • Assess policies and procedures for executive officer expense accounts and perquisites, including the use of corporate assets; and
    • Assess procedures for handling of complaints relating to accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters.

The Corporate Governance and Policy Committee


Sandra O. Moose, Chairperson
Richard L. Carrión
M. Frances Keeth

Donald T. Nicolaisen
Hugh B. Price
John W. Snow

The Board has determined that each member of the Committee meets the independence requirements of applicable laws, the NYSE and the Guidelines. The Committee met five times in 2008.

  • Summary of Key Responsibilities:
    • Evaluate the structure and practices of the Board and its Committees, including size, composition, independence and governance policies;
    • Recommend to the Board changes or additions to the Board’s policies or the Guidelines;
    • Evaluate the qualifications of candidates for election as Directors and present recommendations to the Board;
    • Review potential related person transactions; and
    • Review Verizon’s processes related to charitable contribution policies, selected social, environmental, regulatory and political matters, compliance with equal opportunity and diversity initiatives and safety issues.

The Human Resources Committee


Joseph Neubauer, Chairperson
Richard L. Carrión
Robert W. Lane

Clarence Otis, Jr.
John W. Snow
John R. Stafford

The Board has determined that each member of the Committee meets the independence requirements of applicable laws, the NYSE and the Guidelines. The Committee met six times in 2008. The report of the Human Resources Committee is included on page 26 of this proxy statement.

  • Summary of Key Responsibilities:
    • Oversee the development of Verizon’s compensation policies and practices for senior management;
    • Approve corporate goals relevant to the CEO’s compensation;
    • Evaluate the CEO’s performance in light of goals and recommend his compensation to the Board;
    • Consider Verizon’s policies and practices with respect to succession planning; and
    • Review and recommend to the Board the compensation and benefits for non-employee Directors.

Nomination of Candidates for Director

The Corporate Governance and Policy Committee considers and recommends candidates for Director. The Committee reviews all nominations submitted to Verizon, including individuals recommended by shareholders, Directors or members of management. To be eligible for consideration, any proposed candidate must:

    • Be ethical;
    • Have proven judgment and competence;
    • Have professional skills and experience in dealing with a large, complex organization or in dealing with complex problems that are complementary to the background and experience represented on the Board and that meet the needs of Verizon;
    • Have demonstrated the ability to act independently and be willing to represent the interests of all shareholders and not just those of a particular philosophy or constituency; and
    • Be willing and able to devote sufficient time to fulfill his or her responsibilities to Verizon and its shareholders.

In evaluating candidates, the Committee also considers other factors, including those that promote diversity.

The Committee specifically reviews the qualifications of each candidate for election or re-election, including for incumbent Directors, his or her understanding of Verizon’s businesses and the environment within which Verizon operates, attendance and participation at meetings, and independence, including any relationships with Verizon. Prior to nomination, each candidate for re-election must consent to stand for election and provide an irrevocable resignation to the Committee. If the candidate does not receive a majority of the votes cast for his or her election at the annual meeting, the independent members of the Board will determine whether to accept the resignation and will disclose their decision within 90 days of the certification of the election results.

After the Committee has completed its evaluation of all candidates, it presents its recommendation to the Board for consideration and approval. The Committee also discusses with the Board any candidates who were submitted to and considered by the Committee but not recommended for election or re-election as Directors.

We will report any material change to this procedure in a quarterly or annual filing with the SEC. In addition, we will make any changes to this procedure available promptly by posting that information on the Corporate Governance section of our website at