Verizon responds to U.S. District Court ruling on Microsoft emails

Full Transparency

Our editorial transparency tool uses blockchain technology to permanently log all changes made to official releases after publication. However, this post is not an official release and therefore not tracked. Visit our learn more for more information.

Learn more

We're committed to building trust.

Going forward more of our content will be permanently logged via blockchain technology—enabling us to provide greater transparency with authoritative verification on all changes made to official releases.

Learn more

"We respectfully disagree with the judge's opinion for the reasons stated in our General Counsel’s prior blogs (here, and here) and in our amicus brief (PDF). We support Microsoft's challenge to the decision.

"These matters are very fact-sensitive, and while we have not received a request like this one before, if we were to receive a warrant from the United States Government compelling us to produce data stored by an overseas customer in our overseas data centers, we would challenge the warrant in court."

Related Articles

07.20.2015
Verizon is pleased to release our Transparency Report for the first half of 2015. As in the past, this report describes the different types of demands
02.26.2015
 A 1930s-era statement for a 1930s-era ruling.